<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Conjoint on Benjamin Lauderdale</title>
		<link>https://www.benjaminlauderdale.net/categories/conjoint/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Conjoint on Benjamin Lauderdale</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-GB</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.benjaminlauderdale.net/categories/conjoint/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Pairwise Comparisons as a Scale Development Tool for Composite Measures</title>
				<link>https://www.benjaminlauderdale.net/publications/conjoint-measurement-supervision/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.benjaminlauderdale.net/publications/conjoint-measurement-supervision/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Composite scales are widely used for measuring aggregate social science concepts. These often consist of linear indices obtained as the weighted sum of a set of relevant indicators. However, selecting coefficients (or weights) that reflect the substantive importance of each indicator towards the concept of interest is a difficult task. We propose a method for the generation of linear indices for aggregate concepts based on pairwise comparisons. Specifically, we ask a group of subject-matter experts to perform a series of pairwise comparisons, with respect to the concept of interest, between profiles displaying different combinations of indicators. This allows us to estimate coefficients for each indicator that provide a linear approximation to how experts make the pairwise evaluations. As we show, the method makes it straightforward to assess intercoder reliability, while being a more accessible task than directly asking experts for coefficients. We demonstrate our method with an application to the concept of ‘productive ageing’, including a cross-cultural comparison of weighting schemes derived from a group of Italian and a group of South Korean experts on this concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
